One two three ... Stella
Gianluigi Stella known journalist of the Corriere della Sera, is the witty moralist on me because I would have gone on leave so many years ago by Rai making me pay taxes for the board as a journalist while having been elected to Parliament. The charge is based on ignorance constitutional and non-knowledge of the facts. Strange for a journalist is not it? It's like this: I did not choose the expectation paid by the State. You could not do otherwise. At that time paid the Rai. The mechanism was valid for all employees, journalists and not a public institution. He, too, if it were elected today, he could not practice and should be on leave. From 1998 onwards, until you get to retirement, the contributions I've paid them directly, for almost ten years. But the story is even more curious is the whole story: When I was elected twice as many parliamentary work place, since nothing required a choice. I put my hand in voluntary leave immediately. But rather would then to fool and colleagues told me: "but why did you do that?". Then turned a 'question to the then Speaker of the House, Ingrao, which basically said that all the other MPs from different parties were doing double duty as the DC and insulted on that topic, instead behaved correctly in terms of ethics. An uproar broke out. The question was not accepted, the office said, because it made reference to some colleagues, but Rai in the air became stifling. Rejoined the Board and the story is exaggerated to the point that all the colleagues-journalists looked at me wrong for months. Then, after some time, was taken the expectation that the decision was binding on the elected automatically. So Stella
wrong. But for judges who are on board voluntarily even before the fifty no scandal, however, if they take early retirement and at the same salary as a parliamentarian . The authors of Casta know who you are . If it had affected me all would happen. It does not affect me ... and therefore not talked about. I just hope that in the second edition of the book can be told for certain things as they are, and not as people think they are.
Ora il ceppalonese clone vuol pure passare per persona corretta e dalla morale ineccepibile.
Perché non fa il nome di Di Pietro? Ha paura di essere, giustamente, querelato? Ha paura di perdere la causa ed essere sputtanato ancor di più?
Ma chi crede di incantare con questa favoletta? Si assuma le sue responsabilità, come ha fatto Stella, e faccia i nomi se ha le palle.
Ma sì, lasciamolo delirare in santa pace.
Forse non si rende conto che ormai, in Italia e anche fuori, tutti lo odiano. Veramente.